I'm picking up a used Urus next month and the car currently has steel brakes, but I've been going back and forth about whether I should upgrade to the carbon ceramic setup that Lamborghini offers as an option. I've driven both versions back to back during a test drive and honestly the difference was pretty noticeable, the ceramics had way more initial bite and felt like they'd handle repeated hard braking much better, which is important because this is going to be my daily driver and I do a fair bit of highway driving. The thing is, I've heard horror stories about the cost of replacement when those ceramics eventually wear out, and apparently they don't last as long as people expect if you're using the car regularly on the road rather than just tracking it. I've been trying to Get More Information about what the actual long-term ownership costs look like because I don't want to make a decision based on the initial performance improvement without understanding what I'm signing up for financially. Some people say the ceramics last 80,000 km or more, while others claim they've had to replace them at half that mileage, and the price difference is absolutely staggering compared to steel rotors. I'm also wondering about the noise and dust characteristics, because I've heard ceramics can be squeaky when cold and some aftermarket pads produce less dust than the OEM ones. If anyone here has owned a Urus or similar Lamborghini with both setups, I'd love to hear your real-world experience on whether the upgrade is actually worth it for a daily driver or if I should just stick with the steel brakes and save myself the headache of eye-watering replacement bills down the line.